Psychometric evaluation of the National Kidney Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation Study symptom checklist: reliability and validity.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are critical in the evaluation of treatment effectiveness. The National Kidney Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation Study (NKDKTS) symptom checklist was developed in the 1980s as a means to better understand the relationships amongst end-stage renal disease (ESRD), anaemia symptoms and multiple quality of life indicators. Unfortunately, key components of validity and reliability were not established at the time of the study. The present study helps fill this void by evaluating the psychometric properties of the 13-item NKDKTS symptom checklist, a measure of anaemia symptom frequency, in a dialysis population. METHODS The NKDKTS symptom checklist was administered to 104 dialysis patients in three dialysis units at baseline, 48 h and 7 days. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity via known-groups responsiveness were evaluated. RESULTS Principal components factor analyses produced a single factor at each time point, with all items loading >0.50 across time points, and accounting for 37%, 44% and 46% of the variance at each time point (respectively). Forcing a 2-factor solution across time points yielded a single instance of an item loading more highly on factor 2 (0.57) than on factor 1 (0.53). Internal consistency was good at all three time points (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86, 0.89 and 0.90, respectively). Known-groups validity was evaluated by examining the symptom scores of subjects categorized by haemoglobin level. Subjects with lower haemoglobin levels reported significantly more symptoms, and the point estimates and variance at each haemoglobin level were stable over time. CONCLUSION The results of this study provide further evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the NKDKTS symptom checklist.
منابع مشابه
Arabic translation, adaptation and modification of the dialysis symptom index for chronic kidney disease stages four and five
BACKGROUND Symptom burden in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is poorly understood. To date, the majority of research focuses on single symptoms and there is a lack of suitable multidimensional symptom measures. The purpose of this study was to modify, translate, cross-culturally adapt and psychometrically analyse the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI). METHODS The study methods involved four phases: m...
متن کاملReliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist--Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL). METHODS In total, 53 kidney transplant recipients from one university-affiliated hospital responded to a questionnaire including t...
متن کاملDesign and Psychometric Evaluation of Coping Scale in Recipients of Kidney Transplant
Background: Although there are different tools in a coping context, lots of them are general and not applicable in every stressful situation such as transplant. Aim: The aim of this study is to develop and psychometrically evaluate a coping tool with kidney transplant in the Iranian context and culture. Method: In this sequential exploratory study, based on theoretical and practical definitions...
متن کاملمقایسه هزینه ـ اثر بخشی روش دیالیز با پیوند کلیه با استفاده از شاخص دالی در بیمارستان شهید هاشمی نژاد
Introduction: Long-term hemo dialysis and kidney transplantations are the most common treatment for kidney failure. Regarding the increasing demand of these patients to receive therapeutic services, cost-effectiveness of these methods are compared. Methods: This Cross-Sectional research was done to compare cost- effectiveness of long - term hemo dialysis and kidney transplant using Dali index a...
متن کاملMeasurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can provide valuable information which may assist with the care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, given the large number of measures available, it is unclear which PROMs are suitable for use in research or clinical practice. To address this we comprehensively evaluated studies that assessed the measurement properties of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
دوره 24 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009